Reviews: 2067 (2020) Movie Review
- Related: [ Movie Details for 2067 ]
Subgenres:
HellHorror’s review of 2067 (2020) breaks down the plot, scares, cast performances, and its lasting impact on the horror genre.
2067 (2020) is a futuristic sci-fi thriller that presents a world where humanity is on the brink of extinction due to environmental collapse. Oxygen has become a manufactured commodity, and the only hope for survival lies in a mysterious message from the future. The film follows Ethan Whyte (Kodi Smit-McPhee), a lowly worker who is unexpectedly chosen to travel through time to save humankind. Despite an intriguing premise, 2067 struggles under the weight of its own ambition, delivering a visually stunning yet narratively inconsistent experience.
2067 (2020) – A Sci-Fi Thriller That Reaches for Depth but Falls Short
Director and Main Cast
- Director: Seth Larney
- Main Cast:
- Kodi Smit-McPhee as Ethan Whyte
- Ryan Kwanten as Jude Mathers
- Deborah Mailman as Regina Jackson
- Aaron Glenane as Richard Whyte
The cast delivers competent performances, particularly Smit-McPhee, who carries much of the film’s emotional weight. However, the screenplay fails to give them enough depth, making their interactions feel hollow and forced.
Plot, Themes, and Character Development
Plot Summary
Set in a dystopian future where climate change and corporate greed have ravaged the Earth, humanity survives on synthetic oxygen, but supplies are dwindling. Ethan, a blue-collar worker burdened by childhood trauma, is thrown into a high-stakes mission when a time machine receives a message from 400 years in the future, seemingly from Ethan himself. His journey through time unravels shocking truths about the past, his own existence, and the fate of the planet.
Themes Explored
- Environmental Collapse & Human Greed – The film explores how unchecked exploitation of natural resources leads to societal collapse, a relevant and timely message.
- Fate vs. Free Will – Ethan’s journey questions whether he has control over his destiny, or if he is merely following a preordained timeline.
- Corporate Corruption – The film delves into the morality of corporate decision-making, as those in power prioritize profits over people.
Character Development
- Ethan is an emotionally conflicted protagonist, but his repetitive dialogue and weak decision-making make him frustrating rather than compelling.
- Jude (Ryan Kwanten) serves as a mysterious friend and possible enemy, but his motivations are poorly developed, leading to predictable plot twists.
- Supporting characters lack depth, with many serving as one-note archetypes that fail to leave a lasting impact.
Acting and Cinematography
Performances
- Kodi Smit-McPhee delivers an earnest performance, portraying Ethan’s fear and confusion well, though the script limits his emotional range.
- Ryan Kwanten’s performance is adequate, but his character’s murky allegiances and weak development prevent him from standing out.
- The supporting cast does their best, but the dialogue often feels stilted, making their performances fall flat.
Visuals and Direction
- The cinematography is a highlight, capturing the bleak, dystopian landscapes with stunning precision.
- Futuristic production design is impressive, featuring sleek technology mixed with decaying cityscapes.
- CGI is inconsistent—some visuals look cinematic and polished, while others expose the film’s budget limitations.
Directing Style, Strengths, and Weaknesses
Strengths:
- Visually impressive world-building – The film creates a believable dystopian future with strong production design and cinematography.
- Interesting concept – The time travel and environmental themes offer a thought-provoking premise.
- Ambitious storytelling – The film tries to tackle deep philosophical questions, even if it doesn’t always succeed.
Weaknesses:
- Weak dialogue and forced exposition – Many conversations feel unnatural, with characters frequently explaining the plot instead of showing it.
- Overly convoluted storytelling – While the concept is engaging, the pacing is slow and the time travel logic is messy, making it hard to stay invested.
- Predictable twists – The film tries to surprise the audience, but many reveals feel obvious or unearned.
- Emotionally hollow execution – Despite big themes and emotional stakes, the film struggles to make us care about the characters’ fates.
Final Verdict & Score: 5/10
In Conclusion – Is 2067 Worth Watching?
2067 is an ambitious but flawed sci-fi film that aspires to be thought-provoking but struggles with execution and pacing. While it boasts impressive visuals and an intriguing premise, its clunky dialogue, slow pacing, and predictable twists hold it back.
For fans of indie sci-fi and thoughtful dystopian narratives, 2067 may still be worth a watch, especially for its environmental themes and visual style. However, those looking for a tightly written, engaging time-travel thriller may find it frustrating rather than fulfilling.
Sources Used to Shape This Review
Insights in this review are drawn from director interviews, fan commentary, production notes, and long-form breakdowns across genre-specific platforms. Content is written uniquely and reviewed for accuracy.
- 2067 Rating Scores
- Our Score: 5/10
- Overall Score: 4.35/10
- IMDB: 4.9/10
- MetaCritic: 3.9/10
- Rotten Tomatoes: 3.2/10
Look here for more movies and here you can find 2020 movies to watch on your favorite streaming service.