Reviews: Jigsaw (2017) Movie Review / Ending Explained / FAQs
- Play Trailer Now! (Report missing/broken?)
- Related: [ Movie Details for Jigsaw ]
Subgenres: Gore, Survival, Police, Survival Games, Torture
Horror fans searching for a breakdown of Jigsaw (2017) will find our review covers the plot, themes, and the shocking ending everyone talks about.
Jigsaw (2017) – Twisted Legacy or Tired Return?
Plot, Themes, and Character Development
Jigsaw (2017) marks the return of the infamous franchise a full seven years after Saw: The Final Chapter claimed to close the book. Set a decade after the death of John Kramer, the notorious Jigsaw killer, a series of gruesome deaths begin anew—each victim trapped in a twisted game designed to expose their sins. The plot centers around detectives and forensic experts scrambling to find the culprit as bodies begin piling up, leading to an unsettling truth: Is John Kramer back from the dead?
The narrative plays with the classic Saw structure—interweaving scenes of victims inside deadly traps with a simultaneous police investigation. However, Jigsaw attempts to modernize the franchise by introducing new characters and cleaner visuals. Unfortunately, the newer cast lacks the emotional depth or psychological evolution of earlier entries, making it harder for viewers to form attachments or feel the tension that defined the originals.
Still, the theme of judgment, redemption, and consequence remains intact. The game isn’t just about pain—it’s about forcing characters to confront the darkest corners of their past. Whether audiences find this compelling depends on their patience with the franchise formula.
Acting, Cinematography, and Direction
The performances in Jigsaw are serviceable but largely forgettable. The cast—including Matt Passmore, Callum Keith Rennie, and Hannah Emily Anderson—deliver passable tension but never elevate their roles beyond genre expectations. The real star, as always, is Tobin Bell’s presence. Though limited in screen time, his eerie calm and iconic voice remain the beating heart of the series.
Visually, Jigsaw looks more polished than its predecessors. The traps are well-designed, the sets are more sterile and futuristic, and the gore is strategically executed for maximum impact without crossing the line. Cinematographer Ben Nott brings a glossy layer to the film that contrasts the grittier aesthetic of earlier Saw entries. While this may appeal to modern audiences, it loses some of the raw urgency that fans associate with the franchise.
Directors Michael and Peter Spierig bring a new energy, clearly aiming to rejuvenate the brand. However, the pacing often feels uneven, especially when balancing the trap sequences with the investigative subplot. The mystery is layered well but ultimately predictable for longtime fans of the series.
Directing Style, Strengths, and Weaknesses
The Spierig brothers approach the film with a cleaner, more cinematic look compared to previous entries. They aim to make Jigsaw feel less like a torture-porn experience and more like a mainstream horror-thriller. This change in tone helps widen the potential audience but may alienate those craving the raw grit of earlier films.
Strengths:
Clever use of red herrings and timeline twists
Sharper production value than earlier installments
Satisfying third-act reveal
Maintains franchise identity with evolved aesthetics
Weaknesses:
Emotionally distant new characters
Less psychological intensity than the original Saw trilogy
Fewer standout traps
Pacing issues in middle act
Final Verdict & Score (1–10)
Score: 6
Jigsaw succeeds in rebooting the franchise with a slicker visual style and an intriguing core mystery, but it fails to fully recapture the raw intensity or emotional stakes that made the original Saw so iconic. It’s a decent return for horror fans craving more of the twisted legacy, but ultimately plays it too safe to be truly unforgettable.
Who Will Enjoy It
Fans of the Saw franchise looking for a nostalgic return
Viewers who prefer psychological thrillers with a mystery angle
Horror audiences that enjoy structured chaos and moral dilemmas
Who Might Be Disappointed
Viewers expecting high emotional payoff
Fans of the original gritty visual style
Audiences seeking deeply developed characters over shock value
Most Searched FAQs About Jigsaw (2017)
1. Is Jigsaw (2017) a sequel or a reboot?
Jigsaw (2017) functions more as a soft reboot than a direct sequel. It is set a decade after John Kramer’s confirmed death but introduces a new series of traps and victims. While it keeps continuity with earlier Saw films, it also aims to attract a new generation of viewers by modernizing the visuals and storytelling style. It cleverly bridges old mythology with fresh characters.
2. Is John Kramer alive in Jigsaw (2017)?
No, John Kramer is not alive in Jigsaw (2017). Although the film teases his return with flashbacks and carefully timed reveals, his appearances are part of a deeper narrative twist. The idea of his return is a red herring used to throw both the audience and investigators off track.
3. Who is the new killer in Jigsaw (2017)?
The new killer is revealed to be Logan Nelson, a medical examiner. He was one of Jigsaw’s early victims who survived and was later mentored by Kramer himself. Logan continues the legacy, designing the latest games with the same core philosophy—but adds his own layer of revenge due to a past injustice.
4. What are the new traps in Jigsaw (2017)?
Some of the most notable traps include:
Bucket Head Game: Five victims with metal buckets over their heads must sacrifice blood to escape.
Grain Silo Trap: Victims face drowning in grain while sharp objects fall from above.
Laser Collar Trap: A new high-tech trap where lasers threaten to slice open the victim’s head unless they confess.
Each trap continues the theme of testing moral guilt but uses more refined, tech-driven mechanisms compared to the earlier, grittier setups.
5. How does Jigsaw (2017) connect to the earlier Saw films?
The film honors the franchise’s timeline by acknowledging John Kramer’s legacy, using flashbacks to show how Logan was involved in the early games. It ties back to the original Saw by showing that Logan’s first trap predated all others. This twist repositions the timeline, making Jigsaw both a continuation and a foundation story.
6. Is Tobin Bell actually in Jigsaw (2017)?
Yes, Tobin Bell appears in Jigsaw through flashbacks and voice recordings. Though John Kramer remains deceased in the timeline, his presence is heavily felt and integral to the story’s emotional and thematic weight.
7. Does Jigsaw (2017) set up a sequel?
Yes. The film ends with a clear setup for future entries, positioning Logan as the new apprentice or torchbearer of the Jigsaw legacy. The twist ending reshapes the narrative direction and leaves room for further expansion of the franchise.
Jigsaw (2017) Ending Explained
The finale of Jigsaw (2017) reveals that the gruesome events seen throughout the film are not occurring in real time. Instead, two separate timelines are being intercut—one happening years earlier during John Kramer’s final days, and another occurring in the present with Logan Nelson.
The victims shown throughout the film, including the infamous bucket head trap and the chain-related deaths, took place a decade earlier. Logan was among these victims but survived due to a mechanical error. John spared him and trained him in his philosophy. Fast forward to the present: Logan creates a new game with fresh victims to punish Detective Halloran, whom he blames for a past cover-up that cost lives.
The final twist shows Logan trapping Halloran in a laser collar, forcing him to confess his corruption. Halloran refuses to accept responsibility, leading to his gruesome end, while Logan walks away, declaring himself the true heir to Jigsaw’s moral code.
Key Reveal Elements:
Two timelines blend seamlessly to mislead viewers.
Logan fakes his own death using autopsy results.
Kramer’s philosophy continues through a new apprentice who has a personal vendetta.
This closing sequence both honors the Saw legacy and injects new life into the series, setting the stage for future films with a fresh yet familiar villain.
Sources Used to Shape This Review
Insights in this review are drawn from director interviews, fan commentary, production notes, and long-form breakdowns across genre-specific platforms. Content is written uniquely and reviewed for accuracy.
- Jigsaw Rating Scores
- Our Score: 6/10
- Overall Score: 4.87/10
- IMDB: 5.7/10
- MetaCritic: 3.9/10
- Rotten Tomatoes: 3.2/10
Look here for more movies starting with J and here you can find 2017 movies to watch on your favorite streaming service.
Related Article: JIGSAW (2017) Ending Explained Video
Browse More: Horror Movies 2017 / Horror Movie Quotes