Reviews: King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017) Movie Review / FAQs
Subgenres:
Our honest review of King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017) breaks down its scares, pacing, and whether this horror movie truly stands the test of time.
King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017), directed by Guy Ritchie, offers a gritty, stylized reimagining of the classic Arthurian legend. Blending fantasy, street-smart swagger, and high-octane action, this cinematic reboot aims to revitalize the medieval myth for a modern audience. With fast cuts, mystical creatures, and plenty of sword-clashing spectacle, this version of Arthur trades noble destiny for reluctant heroism.
King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017) – A Gritty Fantasy Reboot With Attitude
Plot, Themes, and Character Development
The story begins with a young Arthur, who is orphaned after his tyrant uncle Vortigern seizes the throne by murdering Arthur’s father, King Uther Pendragon. Raised in a brothel and unaware of his royal bloodline, Arthur grows into a tough, street-smart brawler. Everything changes when he pulls the legendary Excalibur from the stone, thrusting him into a destiny he never asked for.
As Arthur uncovers his heritage and trains to wield Excalibur’s immense power, he must confront his traumatic past, face magical beasts, and lead a rebellion against Vortigern’s dark sorcery and brutal rule. The story focuses heavily on power, legacy, rebellion, and personal transformation.
Unlike the traditional noble king figure, this Arthur is more grounded—a reluctant hero shaped by survival, not privilege. His journey isn’t about embracing kingship from birthright, but about earning it through blood, pain, and conviction. Supporting characters like the Mage, Goosefat Bill, and Bedivere help inject energy and humor into the dark, politically charged narrative.
Acting and Cinematography
Charlie Hunnam leads as Arthur, bringing grit, charm, and swagger to the role. His performance strikes a balance between cocky rogue and haunted warrior, offering a modern spin on the classic hero. Jude Law, as Vortigern, delivers a menacing and theatrical villain, drenched in cold ambition and black magic.
Visually, the film is stunning. The cinematography is high contrast and hyper-stylized, combining sweeping medieval vistas with fast-paced editing and kinetic fight scenes. Guy Ritchie’s signature flair—quick cuts, snappy dialogue, and rhythmic montages—is present throughout, giving the film an unmistakable pulse.
The fantasy elements, including giant war elephants, supernatural shadow creatures, and Excalibur’s slow-motion energy bursts, add mythic weight and eye-popping moments to the gritty realism. The fight choreography is visceral and creative, especially when Arthur channels the full power of the sword.
Directing Style, Strengths, and Weaknesses
Guy Ritchie’s direction is bold, injecting a modern gangster-film vibe into the medieval fantasy genre. His interpretation of Camelot is less about courtly elegance and more about survival, street politics, and brute force. It’s fast, loud, and unapologetically stylish.
The film’s biggest strength lies in its visual ambition and reimagined tone. It avoids becoming another cookie-cutter fantasy epic by taking narrative risks and embracing a rebellious, anti-establishment energy. Arthur doesn’t just inherit the throne—he fights for it.
However, the film struggles with uneven pacing and overstuffed exposition. The first act crams in world-building at a breakneck speed, which may overwhelm casual viewers. While the action is thrilling, the story’s emotional beats don’t always land due to rapid transitions and minimal development of supporting arcs.
Strengths:
Stylized direction and visually inventive action sequences
Charlie Hunnam’s gritty, modern take on Arthur
Strong villain performance from Jude Law
Unique blend of fantasy, rebellion, and urban grit
Excalibur sequences offer explosive cinematic payoff
Weaknesses:
Rapid exposition and uneven story flow
Side characters underused or rushed
Dialogue may feel too modern for traditionalists
Heavy editing style may not appeal to all viewers
Ambitious but not always emotionally resonant
Final Verdict & Score: 6/10
King Arthur: Legend of the Sword is a visually bold and unconventional reimagining that dares to shake up the mythos with energy, attitude, and explosive flair. While the story sacrifices depth for style in places, it delivers an action-packed fantasy adventure with enough originality to stand out. It may not be the definitive King Arthur tale, but it’s the most audacious in recent memory.
King Arthur: Legend of the Sword (2017) – Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Is King Arthur: Legend of the Sword based on the original Arthurian legend?
The film draws inspiration from the traditional King Arthur myth, but it takes major creative liberties. It reimagines Arthur’s rise not as a tale of nobility, but as a gritty street-level origin story, filled with fast-paced action, dark magic, and modern storytelling techniques. It’s a stylized reinterpretation rather than a faithful retelling.
How does Arthur get Excalibur in the movie?
Minor Spoiler: Arthur unknowingly pulls Excalibur from the stone after being arrested and brought before the sword as part of a royal test. His connection to the sword reveals his true identity as the son of King Uther Pendragon, making him the rightful heir to the throne.
Who is the villain in King Arthur: Legend of the Sword?
The primary antagonist is Vortigern, played by Jude Law. He is Arthur’s power-hungry uncle, who murders Arthur’s father using black magic to seize the crown. Vortigern continues to gain power by sacrificing loved ones to a demonic sea creature in exchange for supernatural strength.
What powers does Excalibur have in the movie?
In this version, Excalibur grants Arthur immense supernatural power when fully activated. During battle, the sword slows down time, enhances his speed and strength, and allows him to decimate multiple enemies in seconds. It becomes a symbol not only of royalty but of divine empowerment.
Who is “the Mage” and what is her role in the story?
The Mage is a mysterious woman allied with Merlin. She uses nature-based magic to aid Arthur and the resistance. Her powers allow her to control animals, summon visions, and disrupt Vortigern’s forces. Though not named as Guinevere or Morgana, she fills the role of Arthur’s magical advisor.
Does Arthur become king at the end of the movie?
Minor Spoiler: Yes. After defeating Vortigern in a climactic battle, Arthur fully embraces his destiny. He reclaims the throne, restores peace to the kingdom, and begins establishing Camelot. The film ends with Arthur forging alliances and preparing for the challenges ahead as the rightful king.
Are there magical creatures in King Arthur: Legend of the Sword?
Yes. The film includes a variety of fantasy elements, including giant war elephants, shadowy demon knights, witches, and the tentacled sea creature Vortigern uses for power. These elements create a dark fantasy tone, separating it from more grounded historical interpretations.
Was King Arthur: Legend of the Sword supposed to be part of a franchise?
The movie was initially planned to launch a six-film cinematic universe exploring Arthurian mythology, including Lancelot, Merlin, and the Knights of the Round Table. However, due to its underwhelming box office performance, the expanded universe plans were quietly shelved.
Sources Used to Shape This Review
Insights in this review are drawn from director interviews, fan commentary, production notes, and long-form breakdowns across genre-specific platforms. Content is written uniquely and reviewed for accuracy.
- King Arthur: Legend of the Sword Rating Scores
- Our Score: 6/10
- Overall Score: 5.11/10
- IMDB: 6.7/10
- MetaCritic: 4.1/10
- Rotten Tomatoes: 3.1/10
Look here for more movies starting with K and here you can find 2017 movies to watch on your favorite streaming service.